https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:19333 Wed 11 Apr 2018 17:09:03 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:19329 Wed 11 Apr 2018 16:58:13 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:23225 Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:23:15 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:26764 Wed 11 Apr 2018 12:40:35 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:15486 Wed 11 Apr 2018 09:27:48 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:19131 Tue 24 Aug 2021 14:29:07 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35041 Tue 11 Jun 2019 14:05:53 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:23392 prospect or openness, refuge or enclosure, mystery or enticement and complexity. However, many of the studies which architects reference in design manuals are not actually about architecture, and others have strongly conflicting results. In response to this situation, the present paper undertakes a review of twenty-eight published studies testing preference for spaces which exhibit openness, enclosure, mystery and complexity. The results of these studies are then categorised to develop a meta-picture of the evidence. The paper does not test specific results, or interrogate the methods used, rather it holistically identifies evidence-based claims that have been made about these spatial properties, and summarises the complete set of findings.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:13:56 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:40904 Mon 25 Jul 2022 11:16:47 AEST ]]>